>Aliens Will Not Come in Peace: Stephen Hawking
Posted: April 27, 2010 Filed under: Science, Space, Technology Leave a comment »>
If intelligent alien life forms do exist out in the vastness of the space, they might not be the friendly cosmic neighbors the people of Earth are looking for, famed British scientist Stephen Hawking says in a new television series chronicling his work to explore the secrets of the universe.
An advanced spacefaring extraterrestrial civilization could end up wandering the universe in enormous spaceships on the prowl for vital materials after consuming the natural resources of their own world, Hawking explains in an episode of the show “Into the Universe with Stephen Hawking,” which premiered Sunday on the Discovery Channel.
“Such advanced aliens would perhaps become nomads, looking to conquer and colonize whatever planets they could reach,” Hawking said. “If so, it makes sense for them to exploit each new planet for material to build more spaceships so they could move on. Who knows what the limits would be?”
In the four-part series, Hawking explores topics such as aliens, time travel, and the origin of the universe.
In one episode, he suggests an alien species could be capable of harnessing solar energy to open up a wormhole in space to travel to distant parts of the universe.
“It might be possible to collect the energy from an entire star,” he says. “To do that they could deploy millions of mirrors in space, encircling the whole sun and feeding the power to one single collection point.”
Hawking, one of the world’s most famous scientists, is a British theoretical physicist and former professor at Cambridge University in England. He gained fame through his bestselling book, “A Brief History of Time.”
Hawking is almost completely paralyzed from the neurodegenerative disease amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). He communicates through an electronic voice synthesizer.
In 2007, Hawking got a taste of spaceflight during a trip aboard a modified jet that allowed him to experience the sensation of weightlessness as the aircraft flew in a series of parabolic arcs.
The next episode of the Hawking’s new television series, “The Story of Everything,” premieres Sunday, May 2 at 9:00 p.m. ET.
-
By By Clara Moskowitz, SPACE.com Senior Writer.
>Abstract and Affecting, the New Mars Pictures are a Confrontation With the Sublime
Posted: March 22, 2010 Filed under: Science, Space Leave a comment »>
Stillness and strangeness … Nasa’s image of the Mojave Crater in the Xanthe Terra region of Mars.
Photograph: Nasa
One of the greatest reports the spoof newspaper the Onion ever produced was about the moon landings. “Holy s___,” the headline screamed. “Man Walks On F______ Moon”. Underneath, the story informed us that Neil Armstrong’s first words on touching the lunar surface were “Holy living f___!”
As well as being funny, this pointed to a truth: what else does landing on the moon boil down to? I experienced a version of those feelings myself last week, looking at new photographs beamed back from the Mars Reconaissance Orbiter satellite. I was transfixed. I don’t think I’ve seen images more beautiful and affecting for a long time.
One shot, from Mars’s north pole, shows an ice formation two miles thick: colossal grey-white slabs of frozen carbon dioxide shelving irregularly, their vertical faces powdered with rust by the Martian wind. Another shows linear dunes like planetary corduroy. There is an impact crater, serrated at its edges, bowl-smooth within, a honeycomb pattern deep in its base like something mycelial, or the surface of tripe.
Elsewhere there are what appear to be vertical mineral formations bristling from the lines of ridges, like stands of trees; in fact, they are the tracks of debris released by melting ice, tumbling down the dunes. Another image shows salt flats – perhaps miles across, yet looking like close-up photographs of salt-crystals. A sand dune in Proctor Crater has the sinuous geometry of a Bridget Riley, and is surrounded by a pattern of ripple-textures like the marks left when you pull a piece of paper off the surface of thick paint. It has been coloured steel-blue.
Then there are the moons: Phobos, photographed from no further away than the distance between London and New Delhi, grey-white, like a knob of bone; or Deimos, a pebble in space only a few miles across, with every intricate little pockmark and scar visible.
These are tens of millions of miles away from earth. You feel it shouldn’t be possible to see these things. What is it that makes them so powerful? As images alone they have an impersonal beauty, a compelling stillness and strangeness. Some of them look a lot like abstract art, even though they are representative: a compilation of terabits of data sent back by the HiRise (High Resolution Imagine Science Experiment) telescope, translated into the visible spectrum.
Part of their power is, I think, to do with scale. Thanks in part to the computer colouring and the almost unnatural-seeming level of resolution, many of these photographs look like images from electron microscopy. The surface of a moth’s wing suddenly looks like the surface of a planet; the surface of a planet looks like a moth’s wing. Look at these photographs of Mars, and you often can’t tell if you’re looking at miles, or metres, or microns. It’s a scale with nothing human to anchor it. It suggests an unsettling kinship between the alienness of both the very tiny and the very large.
Time, as well as physical scale, plays a part. The poet Elizabeth Bishop used to say that when she was miserable, as she frequently was, she felt comforted by thinking about things in terms of geological time. There’s a special kind of shiver in the idea that these steppes of frozen CO2 were there, and that these curved dunes were shifting millions of years before humans existed – just as there is in knowing that the night sky is punctuated with the light from dead stars.
But these images are especially potent because we know they are from Mars. Outer space now holds a place in the collective imagination – and in our art and literature – that, in previous centuries, was held by the sea: a repository of everything that is threatening and enticing and other. Outer space is the locus, as the sea was for island people writing Anglo-Saxon poems, of the idea of a special sort of loneliness, a confrontation with the sublime.
Mars, especially among the planets, has taken the place of the mythic island: of Ultima Thule. Carl Sagan once said that Mars was “a kind of mythic arena onto which we have projected our earthly hopes and fears”. This is the Mars not of comical little green men, but of Ray Bradbury’s haunting stories – Dark They Were, and Golden-Eyed, for instance. It’s the Mars Doctor Manhattan visits when he leaves Earth in Watchmen. It’s the Mars, emotionally, of the chorus in David Bowie’s Life on Mars.
These photographs inspire not only awe and wonder, but also a sort of longing. None of us alive at this moment – possibly no human ever – will see these landscapes with our own eyes. And yet here are the pictures. For me, they have the same effect as great paintings or photographs – a feeling that something impossible has been made present, while remaining just out of reach. That a man and a woman are standing in a room that has never existed, or that a moment in time, irretrievably lost, is just the other side of a pane of glass. It comforts and it saddens. Holy s___, indeed. By Sam Leith of guardian.co.uk
>Experts Confirm Asteroid Wiped out the Dinosaurs
Posted: March 19, 2010 Filed under: Dinosaurs, Space Leave a comment »>
This is an artist’s depiction of a huge meteorite striking Earth 65 million years ago, sending the dinosaurs and many other life forms into extinction.
Photograph by: NASA, Reuters
WASHINGTON – Dinosaurs were wiped out by a huge asteroid that smashed into Earth 65 million years ago with the force of a billion atomic bombs, scientists said, hoping to lay an age-old debate to rest once and for all.
The definitive verdict came from an international panel of experts who reviewed 20 years’ worth of evidence about what caused the Cretaceous-Tertiary (KT) extinction that wiped out more than half the species on the planet.
They determined it was a massive asteroid, measuring around 15 kilometers (nine miles) wide, which smashed into what is today Chicxulub in Mexico.
The event marked a pivotal point in history because it cleared the way for mammals to become the dominant species on Earth.
“The asteroid is believed to have hit Earth with a force one billion times more powerful than the atomic bomb at Hiroshima,” the researchers said in a report published in the journal Science.
“It would have blasted material at high velocity into the atmosphere, triggering a chain of events that caused a global winter, wiping out much of life on Earth in a matter of days.”
The panel of 41 scientists hope their findings will lay to rest once and for all the debate about what caused the KT extinction.
Some scientists have argued that dinosaurs and species including bird-like pterosaurs and large sea reptiles were wiped out by a series of volcanic eruptions in what is now India that lasted some 1.5 million years.
The eruptions spewed enough basalt lava across the Deccan Traps in west-central India to fill the Black Sea twice and were thought to have caused a cooling of the atmosphere and acid rain on a global scale.
But the evidence gathered for the study published in Science showed that marine and land ecosystems were destroyed rapidly in the KT extinction, leading the scientists to rule out volcanic activity as the culprit, because its effects would have whittled away at dinosaurs and other species over time.
“Despite evidence for relatively active volcanism in the Deccan Traps at the time, marine and land ecosystems showed only minor changes within the 500,000 years before the time of the KT extinction,” the scientists said.
“Computer models and observational data suggest that the release of gases such as sulphur into the atmosphere after each volcanic eruption… would have had a short-lived effect on the planet and would not cause enough damage to create a rapid mass extinction of land and marine species.”
The Chicxulub asteroid, on the other hand, could very well have made short shrift of dinosaurs, pterosaurs and other species, the scientists said.
The impact of the large asteroid would have “triggered large-scale fires, earthquakes measuring more than 10 on the Richter scale, and continental landslides which created tsunamis,” said Joanna Morgan, a lecturer in geophysics at Imperial College, London and co-author of the study.
The asteroid hit Earth 20 times faster than a speeding bullet and exploded into a deadly mix of hot rock and gas which would have “grilled any living creature in the immediate vicinity that couldn’t find shelter,” said Gareth Collins, a research fellow at Imperial College.
“The final nail in the coffin for the dinosaurs happened when blasted material was ejected at high velocity into the atmosphere,” shrouding the planet in darkness and causing a global winter that killed off species that “couldn’t adapt to this hellish environment,” added Morgan.
Another clue that the KT extinction was caused by a huge asteroid and not volcanic activity was evidence in geological records of “shocked” quartz in rock layers at KT boundary levels around the world.
Quartz is “shocked” when it is hit very quickly by a massive force — such as a 15-kilometer-wide asteroid traveling 20 times faster than a bullet.
The KT extinction marked the end of the 160-million-year reign of the dinosaurs and allowed mammals, and eventually humans, to become the dominant species on earth.
By Karin Zeitvogel, AFP © Copyright (c) Canwest News Service

